GPUS vs REAX: Correlation
Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and Real REMAX Group Inc. (REAX) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.46.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GPUS and REAX?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GPUS and REAX correlate at 0.46, moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.82 versus 0.46 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.45, with an annualized covariance of 71549.3 %².
Within GPUS's tracked universe of 10 assets, REAX comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months REAX outperformed by 395.6 percentage points (-38.5% for GPUS against +357.1% for REAX).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GPUS vs REAX: side by side
| GPUS (Hyperscale Data, Inc.) | REAX (Real REMAX Group Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -38.5% | +357.1% |
| 5-year return | -100.0% | +1133.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 335.7% | 463.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.78 | 1.90 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -100.0% | -76.1% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $0.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | 0.0 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GPUS | REAX |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -89.9% | -71.5% |
| 2023 | -99.6% | +52.4% |
| 2024 | -93.7% | +187.5% |
| 2025 | -96.3% | -20.7% |
| 2026 | +84.5% | +547.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GPUS and REAX good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.46, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GPUS and REAX?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GPUS and REAX is 0.46 over 3 years, 0.82 over 1 year and 0.45 over 5 years.
Is REAX a good diversifier for GPUS?
A fair diversifier. At 0.46, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gpus-vs-reax.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gpus-vs-reax/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GPUS correlations · REAX correlations
