PairBook
HomeGMED › GMED vs MTC

GMED vs MTC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) and MMTec, Inc. (MTC) carry a correlation of 0.35, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.35
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.68
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.28
long-run
Ann. covariance
3771.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GMED and MTC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GMED and MTC correlate at 0.35, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.68) than the 3-year average (0.35). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.28, with an annualized covariance of 3771.2 %².

Within GMED's tracked universe of 15 assets, MTC comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MTC led by 267.9 percentage points, +34.2% for GMED against +302.1% for MTC. Note the risk asymmetry: MTC runs 6.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GMED vs MTC: side by side

GMED (Globus Medical, Inc.)MTC (MMTec, Inc.)
1-year return+34.2%+302.1%
5-year return+0.4%-96.8%
Volatility (ann.)41.6%261.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.740.26
Max drawdown (3Y)-44.4%-99.6%
Market cap$11.1B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)21.15.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: MTC 5.1 vs 21.1Smaller drawdown: GMED -44.4% vs -99.6%Higher 5y return: GMED +0.4% vs -96.8%
-28%0%+654%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GMED · MTC

Year-by-year returns

YearGMEDMTC
2022+2.9%-88.3%
2023-28.2%+29.0%
2024+55.2%-80.4%
2025+5.6%+117.8%
2026-5.5%+11.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GMED and MTC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.35 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GMED and MTC?

The GMED/MTC correlation stands at 0.35 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.68, 5 years: 0.28), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MTC a good diversifier for GMED?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.35 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.35 mean?

A reading of 0.35 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gmed-vs-mtc.json

GMED vs MTC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.35GMED vs MTC0.35

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GMED vs MTC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gmed-vs-mtc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gmed-vs-mtc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GMED correlations · MTC correlations