PairBook
HomeASST › ASST vs GMED

ASST vs GMED: Correlation

Strive, Inc. (ASST) and Globus Medical, Inc. (GMED) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.30.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.10
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-9122.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ASST and GMED?

On 3 years of weekly data the ASST/GMED correlation comes out at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.10 versus -0.30 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -9122.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, GMED places #47 of the 58 assets tracked against ASST. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GMED outperformed by 114.6 percentage points (-80.4% for ASST against +34.2% for GMED). Note the risk asymmetry: ASST runs 17.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ASST vs GMED: side by side

ASST (Strive, Inc.)GMED (Globus Medical, Inc.)
1-year return-80.4%+34.2%
5-year returnn/a+0.4%
Volatility (ann.)723.1%41.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.010.74
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.2%-44.4%
Market cap$2.1B$11.1B
P/E (trailing)21.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GMED -44.4% vs -97.2%
-91%0%+87%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ASST · GMED

Year-by-year returns

YearASSTGMED
2022+2.9%
2023-28.2%
2024-84.6%+55.2%
2025+50.3%+5.6%
2026+56.6%-5.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ASST and GMED good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.30, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ASST and GMED?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.30 over 3 years, with 0.10 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is GMED a good diversifier for ASST?

Yes: at -0.30, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/asst-vs-gmed.json

ASST vs GMED: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30ASST vs GMED-0.30

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ASST vs GMED correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/asst-vs-gmed.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/asst-vs-gmed/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ASST correlations · GMED correlations