GM vs RF: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, General Motors (GM) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF) carry a correlation of 0.51, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GM and RF?
Over the past 3 years, GM and RF moved with a correlation of 0.51, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.44 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.57, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 482.3 %².
Within GM's tracked universe of 35 assets, RF comes in at #11 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GM outperformed by 32.6 percentage points (+48.0% for GM against +15.4% for RF). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.40 and 0.68 over the past three years, a moderate range.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GM vs RF: side by side
| GM (General Motors) | RF (Regions Financial Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +48.0% | +15.4% |
| 5-year return | +82.5% | +83.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 32.2% | 29.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.98 | 1.09 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -29.1% | -31.9% |
| Market cap | $77.9B | $25.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | 38.6 | 12.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 3.45% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | Financials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GM | RF |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -42.4% | +2.3% |
| 2023 | +7.9% | -5.7% |
| 2024 | +49.8% | +27.0% |
| 2025 | +54.2% | +20.2% |
| 2026 | +6.5% | +14.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GM and RF good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.51 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GM and RF?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GM and RF is 0.51 over 3 years, 0.44 over 1 year and 0.57 over 5 years.
Is RF a good diversifier for GM?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.51 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.51 mean?
A reading of 0.51 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gm-vs-rf.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gm-vs-rf/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GM correlations · RF correlations
