PairBook
HomeBAC › BAC vs GM

BAC vs GM: Correlation

How closely do Bank of America (BAC) and General Motors (GM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.52, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.52
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.41
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.59
long-run
Ann. covariance
446.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BAC and GM?

Over the past 3 years, BAC and GM moved with a correlation of 0.52, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.41) runs below the 3-year figure (0.52). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.59, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 446.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, GM places #32 of the 45 assets tracked against BAC. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GM ahead by 23.9 points (+24.1% versus +48.0%). The link looks structural: the rolling one-year correlation barely moved, holding between 0.44 and 0.66.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BAC vs GM: side by side

BAC (Bank of America)GM (General Motors)
1-year return+24.1%+48.0%
5-year return+66.0%+82.5%
Volatility (ann.)26.5%32.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.110.98
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.5%-29.1%
Market cap$427.7B$77.9B
P/E (trailing)14.138.6
Dividend yield1.80%0.76%
Sector / categoryFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
Lower P/E: BAC 14.1 vs 38.6Higher yield: BAC 1.80% vs 0.76%Smaller drawdown: BAC -27.5% vs -29.1%Higher 5y return: GM +82.5% vs +66.0%
-5%0%+54%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BAC · GM

Year-by-year returns

YearBACGM
2022-23.8%-42.4%
2023+4.8%+7.9%
2024+33.9%+49.8%
2025+28.0%+54.2%
2026+12.4%+6.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BAC and GM good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.52 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BAC and GM?

The BAC/GM correlation stands at 0.52 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.41, 5 years: 0.59), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GM a good diversifier for BAC?

To a limited degree. At 0.52 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.52 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.52 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bac-vs-gm.json

BAC vs GM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.52BAC vs GM0.52

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BAC vs GM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bac-vs-gm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bac-vs-gm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BAC correlations · GM correlations