PairBook
HomeGJT › GJT vs ZVIA

GJT vs ZVIA: Correlation

Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. Floating Rate (GJT) and Zevia PBC (ZVIA) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-117.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GJT and ZVIA?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GJT and ZVIA correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.04 versus -0.20 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.07, with an annualized covariance of -117.1 %².

Among the 20 assets we track against GJT, ZVIA ranks #10 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GJT ahead by 56.0 points (+8.6% versus -47.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since ZVIA carries 11.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GJT vs ZVIA: side by side

GJT (Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. Floating Rate)ZVIA (Zevia PBC)
1-year return+8.6%-47.4%
5-year return+44.3%-90.1%
Volatility (ann.)7.3%80.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.021.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-5.3%-78.2%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GJT -5.3% vs -78.2%Higher 5y return: GJT +44.3% vs -90.1%
-56%0%+10%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GJT · ZVIA

Year-by-year returns

YearGJTZVIA
2022+4.5%-42.0%
2023+13.6%-50.9%
2024+10.6%+108.5%
2025+6.2%-44.6%
2026+3.5%-38.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GJT and ZVIA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, GJT and ZVIA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GJT and ZVIA?

The GJT/ZVIA correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.04, 5 years: -0.07), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZVIA a good diversifier for GJT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, GJT and ZVIA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gjt-vs-zvia.json

GJT vs ZVIA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20GJT vs ZVIA-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GJT vs ZVIA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gjt-vs-zvia.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gjt-vs-zvia/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GJT correlations · ZVIA correlations