PairBook
HomeAFB › AFB vs GJT

AFB vs GJT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund Inc (AFB) and Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. Floating Rate (GJT) carry a correlation of 0.23, a weak link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.23
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
21.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AFB and GJT?

Over the past 3 years, AFB and GJT moved with a correlation of 0.23, which is weak. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.23 over 1 year against 0.23 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.14, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 21.5 %².

Out of 24 assets tracked against AFB, GJT lands near the bottom at #21. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at +10.5% for AFB and +8.6% for GJT. Note the risk asymmetry: AFB runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AFB vs GJT: side by side

AFB (AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund Inc)GJT (Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. Floating Rate)
1-year return+10.5%+8.6%
5-year return-9.9%+44.3%
Volatility (ann.)12.6%7.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.26-0.02
Max drawdown (3Y)-15.1%-5.3%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)13.6
Dividend yield4.97%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GJT -5.3% vs -15.1%Higher 5y return: GJT +44.3% vs -9.9%
0%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AFB · GJT

Year-by-year returns

YearAFBGJT
2022-25.9%+4.5%
2023+7.5%+13.6%
2024+4.1%+10.6%
2025+4.4%+6.2%
2026+4.6%+3.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AFB and GJT good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.23, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AFB and GJT?

The AFB/GJT correlation stands at 0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.23, 5 years: 0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GJT a good diversifier for AFB?

A fair diversifier. At 0.23, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/afb-vs-gjt.json

AFB vs GJT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.23AFB vs GJT0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![AFB vs GJT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/afb-vs-gjt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/afb-vs-gjt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AFB correlations · GJT correlations