PairBook
HomeGEOS › GEOS vs PG

GEOS vs PG: Correlation

How closely do Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) and Procter & Gamble (PG) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.16
long-run
Ann. covariance
-296.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GEOS and PG?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GEOS and PG correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.39) than the 3-year average (-0.22). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.16, with an annualized covariance of -296.8 %².

Out of 15 assets tracked against GEOS, PG lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: PG led by 68.1 percentage points, -74.2% for GEOS against -6.1% for PG. Note the risk asymmetry: GEOS runs 5.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GEOS vs PG: side by side

GEOS (Geospace Technologies Corporation)PG (Procter & Gamble)
1-year return-74.2%-6.1%
5-year return-48.1%+13.9%
Volatility (ann.)86.6%15.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.660.19
Max drawdown (3Y)-81.9%-21.2%
Market cap$0.1B$332.7B
P/E (trailing)21.9
Dividend yield0.00%2.94%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: PG 2.94% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PG -21.2% vs -81.9%Higher 5y return: PG +13.9% vs -48.1%
-71%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GEOS · PG

Year-by-year returns

YearGEOSPG
2022-36.9%-5.0%
2023+207.1%-0.9%
2024-22.7%+17.3%
2025+68.8%-12.3%
2026-69.1%+2.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GEOS and PG good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GEOS and PG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.39 over the last year and -0.16 over 5 years.

Is PG a good diversifier for GEOS?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/geos-vs-pg.json

GEOS vs PG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22GEOS vs PG-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![GEOS vs PG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/geos-vs-pg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/geos-vs-pg/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GEOS correlations · PG correlations