PairBook
HomeFUSE › FUSE vs SCNX

FUSE vs SCNX: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE) and Scienture Holdings, Inc. (SCNX) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-4978.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FUSE and SCNX?

On 3 years of weekly data the FUSE/SCNX correlation comes out at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.42 versus -0.23 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.21, and annualized covariance runs at -4978.9 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against FUSE, SCNX ranks #10 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SCNX outperformed by 31.5 percentage points (-94.6% for FUSE against -63.1% for SCNX). One caveat on sizing: SCNX is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FUSE vs SCNX: side by side

FUSE (Fusemachines Inc.)SCNX (Scienture Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-94.6%-63.1%
5-year return-92.2%-99.2%
Volatility (ann.)111.4%193.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.312.75
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.0%-98.9%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: FUSE -96.0% vs -98.9%Higher 5y return: FUSE -92.2% vs -99.2%
-95%0%+77%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FUSE · SCNX

Year-by-year returns

YearFUSESCNX
2022-82.9%
2023+7.6%-14.0%
2024+5.6%+86.9%
2025-85.7%-91.6%
2026-53.8%-25.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FUSE and SCNX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, FUSE and SCNX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FUSE and SCNX?

The FUSE/SCNX correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.42, 5 years: -0.21), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SCNX a good diversifier for FUSE?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, FUSE and SCNX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fuse-vs-scnx.json

FUSE vs SCNX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23FUSE vs SCNX-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FUSE vs SCNX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fuse-vs-scnx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fuse-vs-scnx/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FUSE correlations · SCNX correlations