PairBook
HomeBBGI › BBGI vs FUSE

BBGI vs FUSE: Correlation

Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI) and Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.43.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.43
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.64
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.42
long-run
Ann. covariance
8578.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BBGI and FUSE?

Over the past 3 years, BBGI and FUSE moved with a correlation of 0.43, which is moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.64) runs above the 3-year figure (0.43). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.42, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 8578.7 %².

Within BBGI's tracked universe of 22 assets, FUSE comes in at #9 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: BBGI led by 423.4 percentage points, +328.8% for BBGI against -94.6% for FUSE. One caveat on sizing: BBGI is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BBGI vs FUSE: side by side

BBGI (Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.)FUSE (Fusemachines Inc.)
1-year return+328.8%-94.6%
5-year return-61.6%-92.2%
Volatility (ann.)178.9%111.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.940.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-85.2%-96.0%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BBGI -85.2% vs -96.0%Higher 5y return: BBGI -61.6% vs -92.2%
-95%0%+464%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BBGI · FUSE

Year-by-year returns

YearBBGIFUSE
2022-51.6%
2023-4.3%+7.6%
2024-46.5%+5.6%
2025-46.8%-85.7%
2026+293.8%-53.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BBGI and FUSE good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BBGI and FUSE?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.43 over 3 years, with 0.64 over the last year and 0.42 over 5 years.

Is FUSE a good diversifier for BBGI?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.43 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bbgi-vs-fuse.json

BBGI vs FUSE: 3-year weekly correlation 0.43BBGI vs FUSE0.43

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BBGI vs FUSE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bbgi-vs-fuse.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bbgi-vs-fuse/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BBGI correlations · FUSE correlations