PairBook
HomeFULT › FULT vs MSBI

FULT vs MSBI: Correlation

Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) and Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (MSBI) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.71.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.71
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.66
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.71
long-run
Ann. covariance
743.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FULT and MSBI?

On 3 years of weekly data the FULT/MSBI correlation comes out at 0.71, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.66) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.71, and annualized covariance runs at 743.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, MSBI places #36 of the 45 assets tracked against FULT. The last year tells two different stories: MSBI led by 63.0 percentage points, +24.1% for FULT against +87.1% for MSBI.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FULT vs MSBI: side by side

FULT (Fulton Financial Corporation)MSBI (Midland States Bancorp, Inc.)
1-year return+24.1%+87.1%
5-year return+85.0%+70.9%
Volatility (ann.)30.3%34.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.030.70
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.9%-44.3%
Market cap$4.5B$0.7B
P/E (trailing)11.420.9
Dividend yield3.15%3.90%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: FULT 11.4 vs 20.9Higher yield: MSBI 3.90% vs 3.15%Smaller drawdown: FULT -29.9% vs -44.3%Higher 5y return: FULT +85.0% vs +70.9%
-19%0%+95%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FULT · MSBI

Year-by-year returns

YearFULTMSBI
2022+3.1%+12.0%
2023+2.5%+9.1%
2024+21.9%-6.7%
2025+4.3%-6.9%
2026+25.0%+60.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FULT and MSBI good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.71 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FULT and MSBI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.71 over 3 years, with 0.66 over the last year and 0.71 over 5 years.

Is MSBI a good diversifier for FULT?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.71 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.71 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.71 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fult-vs-msbi.json

FULT vs MSBI: 3-year weekly correlation 0.71FULT vs MSBI0.71

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FULT vs MSBI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fult-vs-msbi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fult-vs-msbi/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FULT correlations · MSBI correlations