PairBook
HomeFULT › FULT vs WSFS

FULT vs WSFS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) and WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carry a correlation of 0.89, a very strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.89
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.77
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.84
long-run
Ann. covariance
810.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FULT and WSFS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FULT and WSFS correlate at 0.89, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.77) than the 3-year average (0.89). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.84, with an annualized covariance of 810.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, WSFS places #8 of the 45 assets tracked against FULT. The trailing year gives WSFS the advantage: +24.1% versus +34.0%, a 9.9-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FULT vs WSFS: side by side

FULT (Fulton Financial Corporation)WSFS (WSFS Financial Corporation)
1-year return+24.1%+34.0%
5-year return+85.0%+85.9%
Volatility (ann.)30.3%29.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.030.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.9%-24.7%
Market cap$4.5B$4.0B
P/E (trailing)11.413.2
Dividend yield3.15%0.90%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: FULT 11.4 vs 13.2Higher yield: FULT 3.15% vs 0.90%Smaller drawdown: WSFS -24.7% vs -29.9%Higher 5y return: WSFS +85.9% vs +85.0%
-12%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FULT · WSFS

Year-by-year returns

YearFULTWSFS
2022+3.1%-8.4%
2023+2.5%+2.9%
2024+21.9%+17.1%
2025+4.3%+5.2%
2026+25.0%+43.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FULT and WSFS good diversifiers for each other?

No. With a correlation of 0.89, FULT and WSFS move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FULT and WSFS?

The FULT/WSFS correlation stands at 0.89 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.77, 5 years: 0.84), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is WSFS a good diversifier for FULT?

No. With a correlation of 0.89, FULT and WSFS move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

What does a correlation of 0.89 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fult-vs-wsfs.json

FULT vs WSFS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.89FULT vs WSFS0.89

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FULT vs WSFS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fult-vs-wsfs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fult-vs-wsfs/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FULT correlations · WSFS correlations