PairBook
HomeFTLF › FTLF vs SRXH

FTLF vs SRXH: Correlation

FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) and SRX Global Inc. (SRXH) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.28
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.19
long-run
Ann. covariance
1574.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FTLF and SRXH?

Over the past 3 years, FTLF and SRXH moved with a correlation of 0.28, which is weak. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.12) than the 3-year average (0.28). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.19, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1574.8 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against FTLF, SRXH ranks #6 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FTLF outperformed by 45.8 percentage points (-46.1% for FTLF against -91.9% for SRXH). Risk is not evenly split, since SRXH carries 2.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FTLF vs SRXH: side by side

FTLF (FitLife Brands, Inc.)SRXH (SRX Global Inc.)
1-year return-46.1%-91.9%
5-year return+67.4%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)47.7%116.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.470.40
Max drawdown (3Y)-57.2%-99.8%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)16.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: FTLF -57.2% vs -99.8%Higher 5y return: FTLF +67.4% vs -100.0%
-94%0%+23%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FTLF · SRXH

Year-by-year returns

YearFTLFSRXH
2022-0.3%-83.3%
2023+19.7%-48.6%
2024+70.7%-78.8%
2025-0.2%-86.9%
2026-37.9%-86.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FTLF and SRXH good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.28, FTLF and SRXH keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FTLF and SRXH?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FTLF and SRXH is 0.28 over 3 years, 0.12 over 1 year and 0.19 over 5 years.

Is SRXH a good diversifier for FTLF?

Reasonably. At 0.28, FTLF and SRXH keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.28 mean?

A reading of 0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ftlf-vs-srxh.json

FTLF vs SRXH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.28FTLF vs SRXH0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FTLF vs SRXH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ftlf-vs-srxh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ftlf-vs-srxh/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FTLF correlations · SRXH correlations