FTLF vs RSSS: Correlation
How closely do FitLife Brands, Inc. (FTLF) and Research Solutions, Inc (RSSS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.30, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FTLF and RSSS?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FTLF and RSSS correlate at 0.30, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.22) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.24, with an annualized covariance of 553.8 %².
Within FTLF's tracked universe of 13 assets, RSSS comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RSSS led by 17.9 percentage points, -46.1% for FTLF against -28.2% for RSSS.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FTLF vs RSSS: side by side
| FTLF (FitLife Brands, Inc.) | RSSS (Research Solutions, Inc) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -46.1% | -28.2% |
| 5-year return | +67.4% | -15.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 47.7% | 38.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.47 | 0.22 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -57.2% | -48.9% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 16.3 | 14.7 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FTLF | RSSS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -0.3% | -22.0% |
| 2023 | +19.7% | +35.4% |
| 2024 | +70.7% | +59.6% |
| 2025 | -0.2% | -29.2% |
| 2026 | -37.9% | -24.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FTLF and RSSS good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.30, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FTLF and RSSS?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FTLF and RSSS is 0.30 over 3 years, 0.22 over 1 year and 0.24 over 5 years.
Is RSSS a good diversifier for FTLF?
A fair diversifier. At 0.30, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.30 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ftlf-vs-rsss.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ftlf-vs-rsss/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FTLF correlations · RSSS correlations
