PairBook
HomeFT › FT vs SPY

FT vs SPY: Correlation

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.45.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.45
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.52
long-run
Ann. covariance
67.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FT and SPY?

On 3 years of weekly data the FT/SPY correlation comes out at 0.45, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.32) runs below the 3-year figure (0.45). The 5-year figure is 0.52, and annualized covariance runs at 67.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, SPY places #6 of the 12 assets tracked against FT. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SPY outperformed by 15.8 percentage points (+4.8% for FT against +20.6% for SPY).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FT vs SPY: side by side

FT (Franklin Universal Trust)SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust)
1-year return+4.8%+20.6%
5-year return+31.6%+82.4%
Volatility (ann.)10.5%14.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.321.00
Max drawdown (3Y)-10.6%-18.8%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)6.0
Dividend yield6.58%1.01%
Expense ratio0.09%
Assets under management$795.3B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Large Cap
Higher yield: FT 6.58% vs 1.01%Smaller drawdown: FT -10.6% vs -18.8%Higher 5y return: SPY +82.4% vs +31.6%

SPY is a Large Blend fund from State Street Investment Management: $795.3B under management, 504 holdings, a 0.09% expense ratio, a 1.01% trailing dividend yield.

-1%0%+21%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FT · SPY

Year-by-year returns

YearFTSPY
2022-14.0%-18.2%
2023+6.6%+26.2%
2024+18.4%+24.9%
2025+17.0%+17.7%
2026+1.1%+13.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FT and SPY good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.45 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FT and SPY?

The FT/SPY correlation stands at 0.45 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.32, 5 years: 0.52), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SPY a good diversifier for FT?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.45 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.45 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.45 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ft-vs-spy.json

FT vs SPY: 3-year weekly correlation 0.45FT vs SPY0.45

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FT vs SPY correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ft-vs-spy.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ft-vs-spy/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FT correlations · SPY correlations