PairBook
HomeFT › FT vs RFI

FT vs RFI: Correlation

How closely do Franklin Universal Trust (FT) and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund, Inc. (RFI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.72, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.72
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.58
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.66
long-run
Ann. covariance
137.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FT and RFI?

On 3 years of weekly data the FT/RFI correlation comes out at 0.72, strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.58) runs below the 3-year figure (0.72). The 5-year figure is 0.66, and annualized covariance runs at 137.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, RFI places #4 of the 12 assets tracked against FT. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at +4.8% for FT and +3.7% for RFI. Note the risk asymmetry: RFI runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FT vs RFI: side by side

FT (Franklin Universal Trust)RFI (Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund, Inc.)
1-year return+4.8%+3.7%
5-year return+31.6%+5.1%
Volatility (ann.)10.5%18.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.320.57
Max drawdown (3Y)-10.6%-16.2%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)6.027.1
Dividend yield6.58%8.41%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: FT 6.0 vs 27.1Higher yield: RFI 8.41% vs 6.58%Smaller drawdown: FT -10.6% vs -16.2%Higher 5y return: FT +31.6% vs +5.1%
-7%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FT · RFI

Year-by-year returns

YearFTRFI
2022-14.0%-22.1%
2023+6.6%+4.4%
2024+18.4%+6.6%
2025+17.0%+3.6%
2026+1.1%+8.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FT and RFI good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.72 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FT and RFI?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FT and RFI is 0.72 over 3 years, 0.58 over 1 year and 0.66 over 5 years.

Is RFI a good diversifier for FT?

To a limited degree. At 0.72 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.72 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.72 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ft-vs-rfi.json

FT vs RFI: 3-year weekly correlation 0.72FT vs RFI0.72

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FT vs RFI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ft-vs-rfi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ft-vs-rfi/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FT correlations · RFI correlations