PairBook
HomeFSTR › FSTR vs ZTEK

FSTR vs ZTEK: Correlation

L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) and Zentek Ltd. (ZTEK) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.39.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.39
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.52
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
1466.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FSTR and ZTEK?

Over the past 3 years, FSTR and ZTEK moved with a correlation of 0.39, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.52) than the 3-year average (0.39). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.27, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1466.2 %².

Within FSTR's tracked universe of 16 assets, ZTEK comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FSTR outperformed by 60.4 percentage points (+42.8% for FSTR against -17.6% for ZTEK). One caveat on sizing: ZTEK is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FSTR vs ZTEK: side by side

FSTR (L.B. Foster Company)ZTEK (Zentek Ltd.)
1-year return+42.8%-17.6%
5-year return+119.1%-78.0%
Volatility (ann.)46.4%80.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.230.63
Max drawdown (3Y)-45.9%-79.2%
Market cap$0.4B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)35.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: FSTR -45.9% vs -79.2%Higher 5y return: FSTR +119.1% vs -78.0%
-51%0%+69%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FSTR · ZTEK

Year-by-year returns

YearFSTRZTEK
2022-29.6%-60.1%
2023+127.2%-30.3%
2024+22.3%-13.0%
2025+0.2%-31.9%
2026+40.4%-12.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FSTR and ZTEK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FSTR and ZTEK?

The FSTR/ZTEK correlation stands at 0.39 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.52, 5 years: 0.27), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZTEK a good diversifier for FSTR?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fstr-vs-ztek.json

FSTR vs ZTEK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.39FSTR vs ZTEK0.39

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FSTR vs ZTEK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fstr-vs-ztek.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fstr-vs-ztek/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FSTR correlations · ZTEK correlations