PairBook
HomeFSTR › FSTR vs IOSP

FSTR vs IOSP: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) and Innospec Inc. (IOSP) carry a correlation of 0.48, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.48
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
591.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FSTR and IOSP?

On 3 years of weekly data the FSTR/IOSP correlation comes out at 0.48, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.32 versus 0.48 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is 0.35, and annualized covariance runs at 591.0 %².

Within FSTR's tracked universe of 16 assets, IOSP comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FSTR outperformed by 31.5 percentage points (+42.8% for FSTR against +11.3% for IOSP). One caveat on sizing: FSTR is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FSTR vs IOSP: side by side

FSTR (L.B. Foster Company)IOSP (Innospec Inc.)
1-year return+42.8%+11.3%
5-year return+119.1%+10.2%
Volatility (ann.)46.4%26.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.230.94
Max drawdown (3Y)-45.9%-48.4%
Market cap$0.4B$2.3B
P/E (trailing)35.419.5
Dividend yield0.00%1.87%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: IOSP 19.5 vs 35.4Higher yield: IOSP 1.87% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FSTR -45.9% vs -48.4%Higher 5y return: FSTR +119.1% vs +10.2%
-22%0%+69%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FSTR · IOSP

Year-by-year returns

YearFSTRIOSP
2022-29.6%+15.2%
2023+127.2%+21.5%
2024+22.3%-9.6%
2025+0.2%-28.9%
2026+40.4%+26.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FSTR and IOSP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FSTR and IOSP?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FSTR and IOSP is 0.48 over 3 years, 0.32 over 1 year and 0.35 over 5 years.

Is IOSP a good diversifier for FSTR?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.48 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fstr-vs-iosp.json

FSTR vs IOSP: 3-year weekly correlation 0.48FSTR vs IOSP0.48

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FSTR vs IOSP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fstr-vs-iosp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fstr-vs-iosp/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FSTR correlations · IOSP correlations