PairBook
HomeFOR › FOR vs SCHL

FOR vs SCHL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Forestar Group Inc (FOR) and Scholastic Corporation (SCHL) carry a correlation of 0.39, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.39
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.30
long-run
Ann. covariance
606.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FOR and SCHL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FOR and SCHL correlate at 0.39, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.25) runs below the 3-year figure (0.39). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.30, with an annualized covariance of 606.5 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against FOR, SCHL ranks #6 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SCHL ahead by 51.8 points (+3.3% versus +55.1%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FOR vs SCHL: side by side

FOR (Forestar Group Inc)SCHL (Scholastic Corporation)
1-year return+3.3%+55.1%
5-year return+34.9%+32.0%
Volatility (ann.)35.8%43.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.840.79
Max drawdown (3Y)-54.7%-62.3%
Market cap$1.5B$0.7B
P/E (trailing)8.617.1
Dividend yield0.00%2.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: FOR 8.6 vs 17.1Higher yield: SCHL 2.00% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FOR -54.7% vs -62.3%Higher 5y return: FOR +34.9% vs +32.0%
-15%0%+83%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FOR · SCHL

Year-by-year returns

YearFORSCHL
2022-29.1%+0.5%
2023+114.6%-2.5%
2024-21.6%-42.0%
2025-5.0%+44.0%
2026+16.2%+33.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FOR and SCHL good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.39, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FOR and SCHL?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.39 over 3 years, with 0.25 over the last year and 0.30 over 5 years.

Is SCHL a good diversifier for FOR?

A fair diversifier. At 0.39, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?

A reading of 0.39 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/for-vs-schl.json

FOR vs SCHL: 3-year weekly correlation 0.39FOR vs SCHL0.39

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FOR vs SCHL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/for-vs-schl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/for-vs-schl/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FOR correlations · SCHL correlations