PairBook
HomeFOR › FOR vs PHM

FOR vs PHM: Correlation

Forestar Group Inc (FOR) and PulteGroup (PHM) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.71.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.71
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.77
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.67
long-run
Ann. covariance
816.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FOR and PHM?

On 3 years of weekly data the FOR/PHM correlation comes out at 0.71, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.77 over 1 year against 0.71 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.67, and annualized covariance runs at 816.8 %².

In FOR's tracked universe of 11 assets, PHM sits right near the top at #3. The trailing year gives FOR the advantage: +3.3% versus -2.5%, a 5.8-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FOR vs PHM: side by side

FOR (Forestar Group Inc)PHM (PulteGroup)
1-year return+3.3%-2.5%
5-year return+34.9%+145.5%
Volatility (ann.)35.8%32.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.840.82
Max drawdown (3Y)-54.7%-38.0%
Market cap$1.5B
P/E (trailing)8.613.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.77%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Lower P/E: FOR 8.6 vs 13.3Higher yield: PHM 0.77% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PHM -38.0% vs -54.7%Higher 5y return: PHM +145.5% vs +34.9%
-21%0%+11%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FOR · PHM

Year-by-year returns

YearFORPHM
2022-29.1%-19.2%
2023+114.6%+128.8%
2024-21.6%+6.2%
2025-5.0%+8.5%
2026+16.2%+8.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FOR and PHM good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.71 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FOR and PHM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.71 over 3 years, with 0.77 over the last year and 0.67 over 5 years.

Is PHM a good diversifier for FOR?

To a limited degree. At 0.71 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.71 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/for-vs-phm.json

FOR vs PHM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.71FOR vs PHM0.71

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FOR vs PHM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/for-vs-phm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/for-vs-phm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FOR correlations · PHM correlations