FLZH vs VRSK: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Flash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc. (FLZH) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FLZH and VRSK?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FLZH and VRSK correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.29 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.15, with an annualized covariance of -2401.6 %².
Within FLZH's tracked universe of 31 assets, VRSK comes in at #18 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VRSK ahead by 71.2 points (-99.2% versus -28.0%). Note the risk asymmetry: FLZH runs 16.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FLZH vs VRSK: side by side
| FLZH (Flash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc.) | VRSK (Verisk Analytics) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -99.2% | -28.0% |
| 5-year return | -100.0% | -1.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 424.7% | 25.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -2.13 | 0.27 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.9% | -50.8% |
| Market cap | – | $24.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 28.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Industrials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FLZH | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -74.0% | -22.3% |
| 2023 | -48.5% | +36.2% |
| 2024 | -32.5% | +16.0% |
| 2025 | -70.4% | -18.2% |
| 2026 | -98.9% | -14.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FLZH and VRSK good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FLZH and VRSK?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.29 over the last year and -0.15 over 5 years.
Is VRSK a good diversifier for FLZH?
Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?
A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flzh-vs-vrsk.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flzh-vs-vrsk/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FLZH correlations · VRSK correlations
