PairBook
HomeBUR › BUR vs FLZH

BUR vs FLZH: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Burford Capital Limited (BUR) and Flash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc. (FLZH) carry a correlation of -0.53, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.53
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.76
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
-10522.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BUR and FLZH?

Over the past 3 years, BUR and FLZH moved with a correlation of -0.53, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.76) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.53). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.36, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -10522.5 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against BUR, FLZH sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #15. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BUR ahead by 31.0 points (-68.2% versus -99.2%). Note the risk asymmetry: FLZH runs 9.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BUR vs FLZH: side by side

BUR (Burford Capital Limited)FLZH (Flash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-68.2%-99.2%
5-year return-62.0%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)46.5%424.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.40-2.13
Max drawdown (3Y)-75.5%-99.9%
Market cap$0.9B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield1.45%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: BUR 1.45% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BUR -75.5% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: BUR -62.0% vs -100.0%
-99%0%+55%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BUR · FLZH

Year-by-year returns

YearBURFLZH
2022-21.6%-74.0%
2023+93.3%-48.5%
2024-17.5%-32.5%
2025-29.7%-70.4%
2026-50.9%-98.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BUR and FLZH good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.53 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BUR and FLZH?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BUR and FLZH is -0.53 over 3 years, -0.76 over 1 year and -0.36 over 5 years.

Is FLZH a good diversifier for BUR?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.53 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.53 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.53 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bur-vs-flzh.json

BUR vs FLZH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.53BUR vs FLZH-0.53

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BUR vs FLZH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bur-vs-flzh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bur-vs-flzh/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BUR correlations · FLZH correlations