PairBook
HomeFLZH › FLZH vs MLCI

FLZH vs MLCI: Correlation

How closely do Flash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc. (FLZH) and Mount Logan Capital Inc. (MLCI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.23, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-5367.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FLZH and MLCI?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FLZH and MLCI correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.25 over 1 year against -0.23 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.21, with an annualized covariance of -5367.2 %².

Within FLZH's tracked universe of 31 assets, MLCI comes in at #19 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MLCI outperformed by 69.0 percentage points (-99.2% for FLZH against -30.2% for MLCI). One caveat on sizing: FLZH is 7.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FLZH vs MLCI: side by side

FLZH (Flash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc.)MLCI (Mount Logan Capital Inc.)
1-year return-99.2%-30.2%
5-year return-100.0%-55.0%
Volatility (ann.)424.7%54.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-2.130.45
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-68.8%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%4.68%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: MLCI 4.68% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MLCI -68.8% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: MLCI -55.0% vs -100.0%
-99%0%+82%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FLZH · MLCI

Year-by-year returns

YearFLZHMLCI
2022-74.0%-28.2%
2023-48.5%-22.3%
2024-32.5%-10.5%
2025-70.4%+125.7%
2026-98.9%-60.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FLZH and MLCI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FLZH and MLCI?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FLZH and MLCI is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.25 over 1 year and -0.21 over 5 years.

Is MLCI a good diversifier for FLZH?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flzh-vs-mlci.json

FLZH vs MLCI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23FLZH vs MLCI-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FLZH vs MLCI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/flzh-vs-mlci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flzh-vs-mlci/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FLZH correlations · MLCI correlations