PairBook
HomeFLNT › FLNT vs RNAZ

FLNT vs RNAZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Fluent, Inc. (FLNT) and TransCode Therapeutics, Inc. (RNAZ) carry a correlation of 0.32, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.32
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.26
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.26
long-run
Ann. covariance
4416.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FLNT and RNAZ?

Over the past 3 years, FLNT and RNAZ moved with a correlation of 0.32, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.26 over 1 year against 0.32 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.26, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 4416.4 %².

Within FLNT's tracked universe of 10 assets, RNAZ comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: FLNT led by 130.8 percentage points, +53.5% for FLNT against -77.3% for RNAZ. Note the risk asymmetry: RNAZ runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FLNT vs RNAZ: side by side

FLNT (Fluent, Inc.)RNAZ (TransCode Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return+53.5%-77.3%
5-year return-77.2%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)78.8%173.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.292.47
Max drawdown (3Y)-65.8%-100.0%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: FLNT -65.8% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: FLNT -77.2% vs -100.0%
-79%0%+89%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FLNT · RNAZ

Year-by-year returns

YearFLNTRNAZ
2022-45.2%-73.5%
2023-38.5%-98.8%
2024-37.3%-98.5%
2025-4.8%-92.8%
2026+54.2%-66.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FLNT and RNAZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.32 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FLNT and RNAZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.32 over 3 years, with 0.26 over the last year and 0.26 over 5 years.

Is RNAZ a good diversifier for FLNT?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.32 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.32 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flnt-vs-rnaz.json

FLNT vs RNAZ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.32FLNT vs RNAZ0.32

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FLNT vs RNAZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/flnt-vs-rnaz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flnt-vs-rnaz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FLNT correlations · RNAZ correlations