FLL vs SEAT: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Full House Resorts, Inc. (FLL) and Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) carry a correlation of 0.42, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FLL and SEAT?
Over the past 3 years, FLL and SEAT moved with a correlation of 0.42, which is moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.33) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.36, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1968.0 %².
By 3-year correlation, SEAT places #6 of the 15 assets tracked against FLL. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FLL ahead by 18.3 points (-45.6% versus -63.9%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FLL vs SEAT: side by side
| FLL (Full House Resorts, Inc.) | SEAT (Vivid Seats Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -45.6% | -63.9% |
| 5-year return | -75.5% | -97.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 59.8% | 78.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.44 | 1.59 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -66.2% | -96.9% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FLL | SEAT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -37.9% | -32.9% |
| 2023 | -28.6% | -13.4% |
| 2024 | -24.0% | -26.7% |
| 2025 | -36.0% | -92.2% |
| 2026 | -21.1% | -13.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FLL and SEAT good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.42 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FLL and SEAT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.42 over 3 years, with 0.33 over the last year and 0.36 over 5 years.
Is SEAT a good diversifier for FLL?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.42 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.42 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fll-vs-seat.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fll-vs-seat/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FLL correlations · SEAT correlations
