FLL vs FNGD: Correlation
How closely do Full House Resorts, Inc. (FLL) and MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.25, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FLL and FNGD?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FLL and FNGD correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.22) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.31, with an annualized covariance of -1135.9 %².
Out of 15 assets tracked against FLL, FNGD lands near the bottom at #13. The trailing year gives FLL the advantage: -45.6% versus -55.7%, a 10.1-point spread.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FLL vs FNGD: side by side
| FLL (Full House Resorts, Inc.) | FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -45.6% | -55.7% |
| 5-year return | -75.5% | -99.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 59.8% | 75.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.44 | -4.54 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -66.2% | -97.6% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 20.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FLL | FNGD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -37.9% | +52.2% |
| 2023 | -28.6% | -90.1% |
| 2024 | -24.0% | -76.6% |
| 2025 | -36.0% | -61.4% |
| 2026 | -21.1% | -49.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FLL and FNGD good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FLL and FNGD?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with -0.22 over the last year and -0.31 over 5 years.
Is FNGD a good diversifier for FLL?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fll-vs-fngd.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fll-vs-fngd/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FLL correlations · FNGD correlations
