PairBook
HomeFEED › FEED vs PMT

FEED vs PMT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, ENvue Medical, Inc. (FEED) and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1167.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FEED and PMT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FEED and PMT correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.42) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.22). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.07, with an annualized covariance of -1167.9 %².

Within FEED's tracked universe of 17 assets, PMT comes in at #11 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: PMT led by 81.9 percentage points, -93.7% for FEED against -11.8% for PMT. One caveat on sizing: FEED is 8.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FEED vs PMT: side by side

FEED (ENvue Medical, Inc.)PMT (PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust)
1-year return-93.7%-11.8%
5-year return-100.0%-9.4%
Volatility (ann.)207.5%25.8%
Beta vs S&P 5002.430.49
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-28.1%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)6.5
Dividend yield0.00%17.33%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: PMT 17.33% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PMT -28.1% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: PMT -9.4% vs -100.0%
-94%0%+39%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FEED · PMT

Year-by-year returns

YearFEEDPMT
2022-75.8%-18.1%
2023-77.2%+36.1%
2024-48.7%-5.4%
2025-96.4%+13.2%
2026-84.1%-20.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FEED and PMT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FEED and PMT?

The FEED/PMT correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.42, 5 years: -0.07), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PMT a good diversifier for FEED?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/feed-vs-pmt.json

FEED vs PMT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22FEED vs PMT-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FEED vs PMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/feed-vs-pmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/feed-vs-pmt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FEED correlations · PMT correlations