FEED vs ILLR: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, ENvue Medical, Inc. (FEED) and Triller Group Inc. (ILLR) carry a correlation of 0.35, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FEED and ILLR?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FEED and ILLR correlate at 0.35, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.53) than the 3-year average (0.35). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.34, with an annualized covariance of 33874.5 %².
ILLR is one of the assets that tracks FEED most closely: it ranks #3 out of the 17 assets we track against FEED. The trailing year gives ILLR the advantage: -93.7% versus -79.6%, a 14.1-point spread. One caveat on sizing: ILLR is 2.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FEED vs ILLR: side by side
| FEED (ENvue Medical, Inc.) | ILLR (Triller Group Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -93.7% | -79.6% |
| 5-year return | -100.0% | -99.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 207.5% | 462.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.43 | 2.45 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.9% | -99.7% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FEED | ILLR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -75.8% | -86.0% |
| 2023 | -77.2% | -68.4% |
| 2024 | -48.7% | +137.0% |
| 2025 | -96.4% | -98.7% |
| 2026 | -84.1% | +207.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FEED and ILLR good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.35, FEED and ILLR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FEED and ILLR?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FEED and ILLR is 0.35 over 3 years, 0.53 over 1 year and 0.34 over 5 years.
Is ILLR a good diversifier for FEED?
Reasonably. At 0.35, FEED and ILLR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.35 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/feed-vs-illr.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/feed-vs-illr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FEED correlations · ILLR correlations
