PairBook
HomeFEED › FEED vs NTIC

FEED vs NTIC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, ENvue Medical, Inc. (FEED) and Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1995.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FEED and NTIC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FEED and NTIC correlate at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.24) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.17, with an annualized covariance of -1995.1 %².

Among the 17 assets we track against FEED, NTIC sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #14. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NTIC outperformed by 102.3 percentage points (-93.7% for FEED against +8.6% for NTIC). Note the risk asymmetry: FEED runs 5.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FEED vs NTIC: side by side

FEED (ENvue Medical, Inc.)NTIC (Northern Technologies International Corporation)
1-year return-93.7%+8.6%
5-year return-100.0%-46.9%
Volatility (ann.)207.5%35.6%
Beta vs S&P 5002.430.01
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-63.3%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.37%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: NTIC 0.37% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: NTIC -63.3% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: NTIC -46.9% vs -100.0%
-94%0%+39%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FEED · NTIC

Year-by-year returns

YearFEEDNTIC
2022-75.8%-10.9%
2023-77.2%-9.4%
2024-48.7%+16.7%
2025-96.4%-41.4%
2026-84.1%+3.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FEED and NTIC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.27, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FEED and NTIC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FEED and NTIC is -0.27 over 3 years, -0.24 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.

Is NTIC a good diversifier for FEED?

Yes: at -0.27, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

A reading of -0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/feed-vs-ntic.json

FEED vs NTIC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27FEED vs NTIC-0.27

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FEED vs NTIC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/feed-vs-ntic.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/feed-vs-ntic/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FEED correlations · NTIC correlations