PairBook
HomeFEED › FEED vs GPMT

FEED vs GPMT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, ENvue Medical, Inc. (FEED) and Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) carry a correlation of -0.18, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1806.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FEED and GPMT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FEED and GPMT correlate at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.21) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -1806.7 %².

Within FEED's tracked universe of 17 assets, GPMT comes in at #9 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GPMT ahead by 36.9 points (-93.7% versus -56.8%). One caveat on sizing: FEED is 4.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FEED vs GPMT: side by side

FEED (ENvue Medical, Inc.)GPMT (Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.)
1-year return-93.7%-56.8%
5-year return-100.0%-86.4%
Volatility (ann.)207.5%47.2%
Beta vs S&P 5002.431.20
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-78.6%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%19.05%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: GPMT 19.05% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GPMT -78.6% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: GPMT -86.4% vs -100.0%
-94%0%+39%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FEED · GPMT

Year-by-year returns

YearFEEDGPMT
2022-75.8%-48.3%
2023-77.2%+28.8%
2024-48.7%-49.0%
2025-96.4%-7.0%
2026-84.1%-51.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FEED and GPMT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FEED and GPMT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.18 over 3 years, with -0.21 over the last year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is GPMT a good diversifier for FEED?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

A reading of -0.18 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/feed-vs-gpmt.json

FEED vs GPMT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18FEED vs GPMT-0.18

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FEED vs GPMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/feed-vs-gpmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/feed-vs-gpmt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FEED correlations · GPMT correlations