PairBook
HomeFE › FE vs GTM

FE vs GTM: Correlation

FirstEnergy (FE) and ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-218.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FE and GTM?

Over the past 3 years, FE and GTM moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.29) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.06, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -218.4 %².

Among the 32 assets we track against FE, GTM ranks #24 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FE outperformed by 71.9 percentage points (+9.9% for FE against -62.0% for GTM). One caveat on sizing: GTM is 3.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FE vs GTM: side by side

FE (FirstEnergy)GTM (ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.)
1-year return+9.9%-62.0%
5-year return+46.7%-93.6%
Volatility (ann.)17.6%55.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.041.57
Max drawdown (3Y)-14.7%-86.2%
Market cap$26.8B$1.2B
P/E (trailing)25.0
Dividend yield3.85%0.00%
Sector / categoryUtilitiesUS Listed
Higher yield: FE 3.85% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FE -14.7% vs -86.2%Higher 5y return: FE +46.7% vs -93.6%
-72%0%+21%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FE · GTM

Year-by-year returns

YearFEGTM
2022+4.8%-53.1%
2023-8.9%-38.6%
2024+13.2%-43.2%
2025+17.3%-3.2%
2026+6.4%-59.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FE and GTM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FE and GTM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FE and GTM is -0.22 over 3 years, -0.29 over 1 year and -0.06 over 5 years.

Is GTM a good diversifier for FE?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fe-vs-gtm.json

FE vs GTM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22FE vs GTM-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FE vs GTM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fe-vs-gtm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fe-vs-gtm/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FE correlations · GTM correlations