PairBook
HomeFCX › FCX vs MOH

FCX vs MOH: Correlation

Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) and Molina Healthcare Inc (MOH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.16.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-308.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FCX and MOH?

On 3 years of weekly data the FCX/MOH correlation comes out at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.23) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.05, and annualized covariance runs at -308.5 %².

Among the 34 assets we track against FCX, MOH ranks #25 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: FCX led by 67.9 percentage points, +80.7% for FCX against +12.8% for MOH.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FCX vs MOH: side by side

FCX (Freeport-McMoRan)MOH (Molina Healthcare Inc)
1-year return+80.7%+12.8%
5-year return+129.3%-25.1%
Volatility (ann.)43.2%44.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.55-0.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-46.3%-70.8%
Market cap$112.6B$10.4B
P/E (trailing)38.81242.2
Dividend yield0.76%0.00%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: FCX 38.8 vs 1242.2Higher yield: FCX 0.76% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FCX -46.3% vs -70.8%Higher 5y return: FCX +129.3% vs -25.1%
-25%0%+71%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FCX · MOH

Year-by-year returns

YearFCXMOH
2022-7.3%+3.8%
2023+13.7%+9.4%
2024-9.4%-19.4%
2025+35.4%-40.4%
2026+55.5%+14.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FCX and MOH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FCX and MOH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with -0.23 over the last year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is MOH a good diversifier for FCX?

Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fcx-vs-moh.json

FCX vs MOH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16FCX vs MOH-0.16

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FCX vs MOH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fcx-vs-moh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fcx-vs-moh/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FCX correlations · MOH correlations