FCN vs TTWO: Correlation
FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.18.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FCN and TTWO?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FCN and TTWO correlate at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.28 versus -0.18 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.06, with an annualized covariance of -133.3 %².
Among the 17 assets we track against FCN, TTWO ranks #11 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance TTWO holds a 11.0-point edge, -10.6% against +0.4%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FCN vs TTWO: side by side
| FCN (FTI Consulting, Inc.) | TTWO (Take-Two Interactive) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -10.6% | +0.4% |
| 5-year return | +7.8% | +47.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 27.0% | 27.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.18 | 0.85 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -39.2% | -27.7% |
| Market cap | $4.2B | $43.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 18.4 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Communication Services |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FCN | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +3.5% | -41.4% |
| 2023 | +25.4% | +54.6% |
| 2024 | -4.0% | +14.4% |
| 2025 | -10.6% | +39.1% |
| 2026 | -11.0% | -9.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FCN and TTWO good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.18 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FCN and TTWO?
The FCN/TTWO correlation stands at -0.18 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: -0.06), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is TTWO a good diversifier for FCN?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.18 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?
A reading of -0.18 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fcn-vs-ttwo.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fcn-vs-ttwo/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FCN correlations · TTWO correlations