PairBook
HomeFBLG › FBLG vs TANH

FBLG vs TANH: Correlation

FibroBiologics, Inc. (FBLG) and Tantech Holdings Ltd. - Class A (TANH) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.30.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.30
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.15
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
4106.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FBLG and TANH?

Over the past 3 years, FBLG and TANH moved with a correlation of 0.30, which is moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.15 versus 0.30 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 4106.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, TANH places #7 of the 15 assets tracked against FBLG. On 12-month performance TANH holds a 6.6-point edge, -87.6% against -81.0%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FBLG vs TANH: side by side

FBLG (FibroBiologics, Inc.)TANH (Tantech Holdings Ltd. - Class A)
1-year return-87.6%-81.0%
5-year returnn/a-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)150.1%104.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.401.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-99.7%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: TANH -99.7% vs -99.9%
-94%0%+5%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FBLG · TANH

Year-by-year returns

YearFBLGTANH
2022-98.1%
2023-44.7%
2024-82.3%
2025-88.8%-88.2%
2026-66.9%-62.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FBLG and TANH good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.30, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FBLG and TANH?

The FBLG/TANH correlation stands at 0.30 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.15, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TANH a good diversifier for FBLG?

A fair diversifier. At 0.30, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.30 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fblg-vs-tanh.json

FBLG vs TANH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.30FBLG vs TANH0.30

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FBLG vs TANH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fblg-vs-tanh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fblg-vs-tanh/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FBLG correlations · TANH correlations