PairBook
HomeFBLG › FBLG vs STRT

FBLG vs STRT: Correlation

FibroBiologics, Inc. (FBLG) and STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION (STRT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.08
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1960.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FBLG and STRT?

Over the past 3 years, FBLG and STRT moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.08) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.23). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1960.6 %².

STRT is close to the least connected end of FBLG's tracked universe, ranking #15 of 15. The last year tells two different stories: STRT led by 92.8 percentage points, -87.6% for FBLG against +5.2% for STRT. Risk is not evenly split, since FBLG carries 2.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FBLG vs STRT: side by side

FBLG (FibroBiologics, Inc.)STRT (STRATTEC SECURITY CORPORATION)
1-year return-87.6%+5.2%
5-year returnn/a+89.4%
Volatility (ann.)150.1%56.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.401.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-36.8%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)14.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: STRT -36.8% vs -99.9%
-94%0%+37%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FBLG · STRT

Year-by-year returns

YearFBLGSTRT
2022-44.5%
2023+23.3%
2024+62.6%
2025-88.8%+84.8%
2026-66.9%-7.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FBLG and STRT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, FBLG and STRT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FBLG and STRT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FBLG and STRT is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.08 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is STRT a good diversifier for FBLG?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, FBLG and STRT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fblg-vs-strt.json

FBLG vs STRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23FBLG vs STRT-0.23

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FBLG vs STRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fblg-vs-strt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fblg-vs-strt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FBLG correlations · STRT correlations