PairBook
HomeEQT › EQT vs ZOOZ

EQT vs ZOOZ: Correlation

EQT Corporation (EQT) and ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1094.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EQT and ZOOZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the EQT/ZOOZ correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.19 over 1 year against -0.22 over 3. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -1094.1 %².

Within EQT's tracked universe of 31 assets, ZOOZ comes in at #26 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: EQT led by 86.8 percentage points, +7.9% for EQT against -78.9% for ZOOZ. Risk is not evenly split, since ZOOZ carries 4.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EQT vs ZOOZ: side by side

EQT (EQT Corporation)ZOOZ (ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.)
1-year return+7.9%-78.9%
5-year return+224.8%n/a
Volatility (ann.)34.1%147.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.521.83
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.6%-93.9%
Market cap$34.3B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)12.7
Dividend yield1.19%0.00%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Higher yield: EQT 1.19% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EQT -31.6% vs -93.9%
-89%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). EQT · ZOOZ

Year-by-year returns

YearEQTZOOZ
2022+57.6%
2023+16.2%
2024+21.4%
2025+17.6%-82.1%
2026+3.1%-22.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EQT and ZOOZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EQT and ZOOZ?

The EQT/ZOOZ correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.19, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZOOZ a good diversifier for EQT?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eqt-vs-zooz.json

EQT vs ZOOZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22EQT vs ZOOZ-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![EQT vs ZOOZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eqt-vs-zooz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eqt-vs-zooz/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EQT correlations · ZOOZ correlations