PairBook
HomeEQT › EQT vs SER

EQT vs SER: Correlation

How closely do EQT Corporation (EQT) and Serina Therapeutics, Inc. (SER) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-677.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EQT and SER?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of EQT and SER correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.07) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.20). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.05, with an annualized covariance of -677.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, SER places #24 of the 31 assets tracked against EQT. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months EQT outperformed by 57.4 percentage points (+7.9% for EQT against -49.5% for SER). Note the risk asymmetry: SER runs 2.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EQT vs SER: side by side

EQT (EQT Corporation)SER (Serina Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return+7.9%-49.5%
5-year return+224.8%-93.1%
Volatility (ann.)34.1%98.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.52-0.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.6%-95.5%
Market cap$34.3B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)12.7
Dividend yield1.19%0.00%
Sector / categoryEnergyUS Listed
Higher yield: EQT 1.19% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EQT -31.6% vs -95.5%Higher 5y return: EQT +224.8% vs -93.1%
-70%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. EQT · SER

Year-by-year returns

YearEQTSER
2022+57.6%-49.4%
2023+16.2%-30.3%
2024+21.4%-63.6%
2025+17.6%-61.8%
2026+3.1%+31.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EQT and SER good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, EQT and SER have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EQT and SER?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EQT and SER is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.07 over 1 year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is SER a good diversifier for EQT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, EQT and SER have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eqt-vs-ser.json

EQT vs SER: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20EQT vs SER-0.20

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![EQT vs SER correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eqt-vs-ser.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eqt-vs-ser/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EQT correlations · SER correlations