PairBook
HomeEML › EML vs TBCH

EML vs TBCH: Correlation

How closely do Eastern Company (The) (EML) and Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.42, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.42
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
969.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EML and TBCH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of EML and TBCH correlate at 0.42, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.31) runs below the 3-year figure (0.42). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.34, with an annualized covariance of 969.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, TBCH places #5 of the 10 assets tracked against EML. The last year tells two different stories: EML led by 28.5 percentage points, +11.9% for EML against -16.6% for TBCH.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EML vs TBCH: side by side

EML (Eastern Company (The))TBCH (Turtle Beach Corporation)
1-year return+11.9%-16.6%
5-year return+6.9%-55.7%
Volatility (ann.)39.5%57.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.992.21
Max drawdown (3Y)-47.0%-51.8%
Market cap$0.2B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)19.8
Dividend yield1.69%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: EML 1.69% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EML -47.0% vs -51.8%Higher 5y return: EML +6.9% vs -55.7%
-34%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. EML · TBCH

Year-by-year returns

YearEMLTBCH
2022-21.5%-67.8%
2023+16.8%+52.7%
2024+22.6%+58.1%
2025-24.4%-18.9%
2026+35.9%-7.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EML and TBCH good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.42, EML and TBCH keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EML and TBCH?

The EML/TBCH correlation stands at 0.42 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.31, 5 years: 0.34), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TBCH a good diversifier for EML?

Reasonably. At 0.42, EML and TBCH keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.42 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eml-vs-tbch.json

EML vs TBCH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.42EML vs TBCH0.42

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![EML vs TBCH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eml-vs-tbch.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eml-vs-tbch/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EML correlations · TBCH correlations