PairBook
HomeEML › EML vs FBIN

EML vs FBIN: Correlation

Eastern Company (The) (EML) and Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.44.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.44
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
679.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EML and FBIN?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of EML and FBIN correlate at 0.44, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.34) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.36, with an annualized covariance of 679.2 %².

In EML's tracked universe of 10 assets, FBIN sits right near the top at #1. The last year tells two different stories: EML led by 34.0 percentage points, +11.9% for EML against -22.1% for FBIN.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EML vs FBIN: side by side

EML (Eastern Company (The))FBIN (Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.)
1-year return+11.9%-22.1%
5-year return+6.9%-42.9%
Volatility (ann.)39.5%38.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.991.29
Max drawdown (3Y)-47.0%-61.9%
Market cap$0.2B$5.4B
P/E (trailing)19.837.4
Dividend yield1.69%2.20%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: EML 19.8 vs 37.4Higher yield: FBIN 2.20% vs 1.69%Smaller drawdown: EML -47.0% vs -61.9%Higher 5y return: EML +6.9% vs -42.9%
-43%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. EML · FBIN

Year-by-year returns

YearEMLFBIN
2022-21.5%-36.5%
2023+16.8%+35.2%
2024+22.6%-9.1%
2025-24.4%-25.4%
2026+35.9%-7.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EML and FBIN good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.44, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EML and FBIN?

The EML/FBIN correlation stands at 0.44 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.34, 5 years: 0.36), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is FBIN a good diversifier for EML?

A fair diversifier. At 0.44, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?

A reading of 0.44 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eml-vs-fbin.json

EML vs FBIN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.44EML vs FBIN0.44

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![EML vs FBIN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eml-vs-fbin.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eml-vs-fbin/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EML correlations · FBIN correlations