PairBook
HomeELAB › ELAB vs TPL

ELAB vs TPL: Correlation

How closely do PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1855.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ELAB and TPL?

Over the past 3 years, ELAB and TPL moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.32 versus -0.19 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1855.7 %².

By 3-year correlation, TPL places #11 of the 20 assets tracked against ELAB. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TPL outperformed by 122.5 percentage points (-99.7% for ELAB against +22.8% for TPL). Risk is not evenly split, since ELAB carries 3.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ELAB vs TPL: side by side

ELAB (PMGC Holdings Inc.)TPL (Texas Pacific Land Corporation)
1-year return-99.7%+22.8%
5-year returnn/a+149.6%
Volatility (ann.)195.6%50.0%
Beta vs S&P 5002.500.62
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-52.2%
Market cap$25.5B
P/E (trailing)47.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.61%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Higher yield: TPL 0.61% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TPL -52.2% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+80%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ELAB · TPL

Year-by-year returns

YearELABTPL
2022+91.3%
2023-32.4%
2024-99.4%+115.3%
2025-97.4%-21.6%
2026-98.4%+29.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ELAB and TPL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, ELAB and TPL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ELAB and TPL?

The ELAB/TPL correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.32, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TPL a good diversifier for ELAB?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, ELAB and TPL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/elab-vs-tpl.json

ELAB vs TPL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19ELAB vs TPL-0.19

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ELAB vs TPL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/elab-vs-tpl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/elab-vs-tpl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ELAB correlations · TPL correlations