PairBook
HomeELAB › ELAB vs ICMB

ELAB vs ICMB: Correlation

PMGC Holdings Inc. (ELAB) and Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.30.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2621.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ELAB and ICMB?

On 3 years of weekly data the ELAB/ICMB correlation comes out at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.43) than the 3-year average (-0.30). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -2621.7 %².

Out of 20 assets tracked against ELAB, ICMB lands near the bottom at #18. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ICMB outperformed by 31.7 percentage points (-99.7% for ELAB against -68.0% for ICMB). Risk is not evenly split, since ELAB carries 4.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ELAB vs ICMB: side by side

ELAB (PMGC Holdings Inc.)ICMB (Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.)
1-year return-99.7%-68.0%
5-year returnn/a-68.9%
Volatility (ann.)195.6%44.6%
Beta vs S&P 5002.500.46
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-75.5%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%28.76%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: ICMB 28.76% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ICMB -75.5% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ELAB · ICMB

Year-by-year returns

YearELABICMB
2022-19.0%
2023+19.0%
2024-99.4%+0.7%
2025-97.4%+5.9%
2026-98.4%-68.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ELAB and ICMB good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, ELAB and ICMB have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ELAB and ICMB?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.30 over 3 years, with -0.43 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is ICMB a good diversifier for ELAB?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, ELAB and ICMB have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/elab-vs-icmb.json

ELAB vs ICMB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30ELAB vs ICMB-0.30

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ELAB vs ICMB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/elab-vs-icmb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/elab-vs-icmb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ELAB correlations · ICMB correlations