PairBook
HomeEBMT › EBMT vs VXZ

EBMT vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.33, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.25
long-run
Ann. covariance
-209.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EBMT and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of EBMT and VXZ correlate at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.36 over 1 year against -0.33 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.25, with an annualized covariance of -209.7 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of EBMT's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 12. The last year tells two different stories: EBMT led by 48.3 percentage points, +32.2% for EBMT against -16.1% for VXZ.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EBMT vs VXZ: side by side

EBMT (Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+32.2%-16.1%
5-year return+21.5%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)25.2%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.51-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-22.2%-36.4%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)11.0
Dividend yield2.56%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: EBMT -22.2% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: EBMT +21.5% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+39%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. EBMT · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearEBMTVXZ
2022-27.8%+0.5%
2023+1.9%-44.0%
2024+1.1%-12.7%
2025+34.4%+5.7%
2026+14.8%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EBMT and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, EBMT and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EBMT and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.33 over 3 years, with -0.36 over the last year and -0.25 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for EBMT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, EBMT and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ebmt-vs-vxz.json

EBMT vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33EBMT vs VXZ-0.33

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![EBMT vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ebmt-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ebmt-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EBMT correlations · VXZ correlations