ATPC vs EBMT: Correlation
Agape ATP Corporation (ATPC) and Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc. (EBMT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ATPC and EBMT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ATPC and EBMT correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.33 over 1 year against -0.24 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -909.5 %².
Within ATPC's tracked universe of 17 assets, EBMT comes in at #12 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: EBMT led by 128.8 percentage points, -96.6% for ATPC against +32.2% for EBMT. Risk is not evenly split, since ATPC carries 6.0 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ATPC vs EBMT: side by side
| ATPC (Agape ATP Corporation) | EBMT (Eagle Bancorp Montana, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -96.6% | +32.2% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +21.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 151.3% | 25.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.04 | 0.51 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -100.0% | -22.2% |
| Market cap | – | $0.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 11.0 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.56% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ATPC | EBMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -27.8% |
| 2023 | – | +1.9% |
| 2024 | -90.8% | +1.1% |
| 2025 | -90.9% | +34.4% |
| 2026 | -55.7% | +14.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ATPC and EBMT good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ATPC and EBMT?
The ATPC/EBMT correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.33, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is EBMT a good diversifier for ATPC?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?
A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/atpc-vs-ebmt.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/atpc-vs-ebmt/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ATPC correlations · EBMT correlations
