PairBook
HomeEAF › EAF vs UHS

EAF vs UHS: Correlation

GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) and Universal Health Services (UHS) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-731.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EAF and UHS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of EAF and UHS correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.43) than the 3-year average (-0.25). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.06, with an annualized covariance of -731.7 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against EAF, UHS lands near the bottom at #11. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months UHS outperformed by 20.3 percentage points (-25.3% for EAF against -5.0% for UHS). Note the risk asymmetry: EAF runs 3.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EAF vs UHS: side by side

EAF (GrafTech International Ltd.)UHS (Universal Health Services)
1-year return-25.3%-5.0%
5-year return-93.3%+13.5%
Volatility (ann.)96.0%31.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.470.60
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.7%-42.0%
Market cap$0.2B$10.2B
P/E (trailing)7.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.45%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Higher yield: UHS 0.45% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: UHS -42.0% vs -86.7%Higher 5y return: UHS +13.5% vs -93.3%
-43%0%+84%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. EAF · UHS

Year-by-year returns

YearEAFUHS
2022-59.5%+9.4%
2023-53.8%+8.8%
2024-21.0%+18.2%
2025-10.3%+22.0%
2026-52.1%-20.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EAF and UHS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, EAF and UHS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EAF and UHS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EAF and UHS is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.43 over 1 year and -0.06 over 5 years.

Is UHS a good diversifier for EAF?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, EAF and UHS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eaf-vs-uhs.json

EAF vs UHS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25EAF vs UHS-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![EAF vs UHS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eaf-vs-uhs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eaf-vs-uhs/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EAF correlations · UHS correlations