PairBook
HomeEAF › EAF vs IMKTA

EAF vs IMKTA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) and Ingles Markets, Incorporated (IMKTA) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-568.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are EAF and IMKTA?

Over the past 3 years, EAF and IMKTA moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.43) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.24). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.08, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -568.8 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against EAF, IMKTA lands near the bottom at #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with IMKTA ahead by 47.8 points (-25.3% versus +22.5%). Note the risk asymmetry: EAF runs 3.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

EAF vs IMKTA: side by side

EAF (GrafTech International Ltd.)IMKTA (Ingles Markets, Incorporated)
1-year return-25.3%+22.5%
5-year return-93.3%+28.3%
Volatility (ann.)96.0%24.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.470.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.7%-32.0%
Market cap$0.2B$1.6B
P/E (trailing)15.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.79%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: IMKTA 0.79% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IMKTA -32.0% vs -86.7%Higher 5y return: IMKTA +28.3% vs -93.3%
-43%0%+84%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. EAF · IMKTA

Year-by-year returns

YearEAFIMKTA
2022-59.5%+12.6%
2023-53.8%-9.8%
2024-21.0%-24.7%
2025-10.3%+7.4%
2026-52.1%+20.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are EAF and IMKTA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, EAF and IMKTA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between EAF and IMKTA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between EAF and IMKTA is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.43 over 1 year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is IMKTA a good diversifier for EAF?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, EAF and IMKTA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eaf-vs-imkta.json

EAF vs IMKTA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24EAF vs IMKTA-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![EAF vs IMKTA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eaf-vs-imkta.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eaf-vs-imkta/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: EAF correlations · IMKTA correlations