PairBook
HomeDXCM › DXCM vs RGC

DXCM vs RGC: Correlation

Dexcom (DXCM) and Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited (RGC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.02
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3554.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DXCM and RGC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DXCM and RGC correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.02 versus -0.17 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.13, with an annualized covariance of -3554.1 %².

Within DXCM's tracked universe of 28 assets, RGC comes in at #21 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: DXCM led by 78.1 percentage points, +16.9% for DXCM against -61.2% for RGC. Note the risk asymmetry: RGC runs 9.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DXCM vs RGC: side by side

DXCM (Dexcom)RGC (Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited)
1-year return+16.9%-61.2%
5-year return-31.5%+626.3%
Volatility (ann.)46.7%441.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.02-2.00
Max drawdown (3Y)-61.0%-93.9%
Market cap$33.7B
P/E (trailing)35.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: DXCM -61.0% vs -93.9%Higher 5y return: RGC +626.3% vs -31.5%
-62%0%+245%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. DXCM · RGC

Year-by-year returns

YearDXCMRGC
2022-15.6%-12.4%
2023+9.6%-62.4%
2024-37.3%-53.0%
2025-14.7%+16053.8%
2026+34.5%-73.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DXCM and RGC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DXCM and RGC?

The DXCM/RGC correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.02, 5 years: -0.13), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RGC a good diversifier for DXCM?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dxcm-vs-rgc.json

DXCM vs RGC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17DXCM vs RGC-0.17

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![DXCM vs RGC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dxcm-vs-rgc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dxcm-vs-rgc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DXCM correlations · RGC correlations