DXCM vs SVV: Correlation
How closely do Dexcom (DXCM) and Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.41, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are DXCM and SVV?
Over the past 3 years, DXCM and SVV moved with a correlation of 0.41, which is moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.57 versus 0.41 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1063.7 %².
Within DXCM's tracked universe of 28 assets, SVV comes in at #4 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: DXCM led by 26.3 percentage points, +16.9% for DXCM against -9.4% for SVV.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
DXCM vs SVV: side by side
| DXCM (Dexcom) | SVV (Savers Value Village, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +16.9% | -9.4% |
| 5-year return | -31.5% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 46.7% | 55.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.02 | 0.87 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -61.0% | -73.6% |
| Market cap | $33.7B | $1.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 35.2 | 70.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Health Care | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | DXCM | SVV |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -15.6% | – |
| 2023 | +9.6% | – |
| 2024 | -37.3% | -41.0% |
| 2025 | -14.7% | -8.9% |
| 2026 | +34.5% | +12.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are DXCM and SVV good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.41, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between DXCM and SVV?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DXCM and SVV is 0.41 over 3 years, 0.57 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is SVV a good diversifier for DXCM?
A fair diversifier. At 0.41, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.41 mean?
A reading of 0.41 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dxcm-vs-svv.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dxcm-vs-svv/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: DXCM correlations · SVV correlations
