PairBook
HomeDXCM › DXCM vs PARA

DXCM vs PARA: Correlation

How closely do Dexcom (DXCM) and Banzai International, Inc. (PARA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.17, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-898.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DXCM and PARA?

On 3 years of weekly data the DXCM/PARA correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.30) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.17). The 5-year figure is -0.13, and annualized covariance runs at -898.7 %².

Within DXCM's tracked universe of 28 assets, PARA comes in at #20 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with DXCM ahead by 115.1 points (+16.9% versus -98.2%). Note the risk asymmetry: PARA runs 2.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DXCM vs PARA: side by side

DXCM (Dexcom)PARA (Banzai International, Inc.)
1-year return+16.9%-98.2%
5-year return-31.5%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)46.7%114.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.02-0.02
Max drawdown (3Y)-61.0%-100.0%
Market cap$33.7B
P/E (trailing)35.20.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Lower P/E: PARA 0.1 vs 35.2Smaller drawdown: DXCM -61.0% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: DXCM -31.5% vs -100.0%
-98%0%+36%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DXCM · PARA

Year-by-year returns

YearDXCMPARA
2022-15.6%+3.7%
2023+9.6%-81.4%
2024-37.3%-98.4%
2025-14.7%-93.7%
2026+34.5%-93.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DXCM and PARA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DXCM and PARA?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.17 over 3 years, with -0.30 over the last year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is PARA a good diversifier for DXCM?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dxcm-vs-para.json

DXCM vs PARA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17DXCM vs PARA-0.17

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DXCM vs PARA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dxcm-vs-para.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dxcm-vs-para/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DXCM correlations · PARA correlations