PairBook
HomeDOGZ › DOGZ vs TLS

DOGZ vs TLS: Correlation

Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) and Telos Corporation (TLS) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.28
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
4751.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DOGZ and TLS?

On 3 years of weekly data the DOGZ/TLS correlation comes out at 0.28, weak. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.07 versus 0.28 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is 0.20, and annualized covariance runs at 4751.5 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against DOGZ, TLS ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TLS outperformed by 73.1 percentage points (-90.4% for DOGZ against -17.3% for TLS).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DOGZ vs TLS: side by side

DOGZ (Dogness (International) Corporation)TLS (Telos Corporation)
1-year return-90.4%-17.3%
5-year return-97.9%-85.1%
Volatility (ann.)153.8%110.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.092.54
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.5%-58.3%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: TLS -58.3% vs -98.5%Higher 5y return: TLS -85.1% vs -97.9%
-92%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DOGZ · TLS

Year-by-year returns

YearDOGZTLS
2022-88.3%-67.0%
2023-74.0%-28.3%
2024+793.7%-6.3%
2025-76.7%+49.1%
2026-90.4%-5.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DOGZ and TLS good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.28, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DOGZ and TLS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.28 over 3 years, with 0.07 over the last year and 0.20 over 5 years.

Is TLS a good diversifier for DOGZ?

A fair diversifier. At 0.28, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.28 mean?

A reading of 0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dogz-vs-tls.json

DOGZ vs TLS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.28DOGZ vs TLS0.28

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DOGZ vs TLS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dogz-vs-tls.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dogz-vs-tls/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DOGZ correlations · TLS correlations