DOGZ vs FEED: Correlation
Dogness (International) Corporation (DOGZ) and ENvue Medical, Inc. (FEED) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are DOGZ and FEED?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DOGZ and FEED correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.63) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.25). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.18, with an annualized covariance of -7849.3 %².
FEED is close to the least connected end of DOGZ's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 11. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at -90.4% for DOGZ and -93.7% for FEED.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
DOGZ vs FEED: side by side
| DOGZ (Dogness (International) Corporation) | FEED (ENvue Medical, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -90.4% | -93.7% |
| 5-year return | -97.9% | -100.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 153.8% | 207.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.09 | 2.43 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.5% | -99.9% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | DOGZ | FEED |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -88.3% | -75.8% |
| 2023 | -74.0% | -77.2% |
| 2024 | +793.7% | -48.7% |
| 2025 | -76.7% | -96.4% |
| 2026 | -90.4% | -84.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are DOGZ and FEED good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between DOGZ and FEED?
The DOGZ/FEED correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.63, 5 years: -0.18), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is FEED a good diversifier for DOGZ?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dogz-vs-feed.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dogz-vs-feed/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: DOGZ correlations · FEED correlations